Average customer rating:
- The Birth of a Nation
- Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer.
- The American "Triumph of Will"
- For study, not entertainment.
- Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!
|
The Birth of a Nation
Starring:
Spottiswoode Aitken ,
Mary Alden ,
George Beranger ,
Elmer Clifton , and
Miriam Cooper
Manufacturer: Image Entertainment
ProductGroup: DVD
Binding: DVD
General
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Drama
| Silent Films
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Silent Films
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Drama
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Assassination
| Blackmail, Murder & Mayhem
| Mystery & Suspense
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Cooper, Miriam
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Crisp, Donald
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Gish, Lillian
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Harron, Robert
| ( H )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Lewis, Ralph
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Long, Walter
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Marsh, Mae
| ( M )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Reid, Wallace
| ( R )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Walthall, Henry B
| ( W )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
DVDs Under $14.99
| Today's Deals in DVD
| Special Features
| DVD
| Video
( B )
| Titles
| Features
| DVD
| Video
Similar Items:
-
Battleship Potemkin
-
Metropolis (Restored Authorized Edition)
-
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
-
Intolerance (1916) (Silent) (B&W)
-
Citizen Kane
ASIN: 6305130949
Release Date: 1998-11-17 |
Amazon.com essential video
A pivotal moment in film history. After The Birth of a Nation, nothing was the same: not the way audiences watched movies, not the way filmmakers created them. D.W. Griffith's jumbo-size saga of the Civil War expanded the boundaries of storytelling on the screen, conveying a richer, more complicated (and certainly longer) tale than anyone had seen in a movie before. The delicate relationships, the sad passage of time, the spectacular battle scenes all look as fresh and innovative today as they did in 1915. So do Griffith's brilliant actors, most of them--including favorite leading lady Lillian Gish--drawn from his regular stock company. What has become increasingly problematic about The Birth of a Nation is Griffith's condescending attitude toward black slaves, and the ringing excitement surrounding the founding of the Ku Klux Klan. Griffith, whose political ideas were naive at best, seemed genuinely surprised by the criticism of his masterwork, and for his next project he turned to the humanist preaching of the massive Intolerance. Despite protests, Birth sold more tickets than any other movie, a record that stood for decades, and President Woodrow Wilson famously compared it to "history written in lightning." That judgment has lasted. --Robert Horton
Description
Based on a play called "The Clansmen," D.W. Griffith's three-hour Civil War epic traces the development of the Civil War itself, the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan through the lives of two families.
Customer Reviews:
The Birth of a Nation.......2007-08-31
A good educational film for "the way we were" Definitely a must for film makers
Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer........2007-08-10
The use of changing camera angles, breathtaking battle scenes involving literally hundreds of actors and extras, and manipulating colored lens filters to alter the mood were revolutionary techniques during an age when moving pictures was still in its infancy, as the 1915 film is a visual masterpiece.
Sadly, beneath this masterful portrayal of the Civil War and the ensuing Reconstruction period lies a treacherous ulterior motive: To serve as justification for the formation and existence of the Klu Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization that uses terror, violence and murder to advance its racist agenda.
The three-hour silent film has two acts - much like a theatre production with an intermission - the first of which begins by introducing main characters and setting the stage for the War from the social and political perspective of the Confederate South. However, from almost the first frame the wheels of propaganda begin to turn. Immediately following the introductory titles, words on the screen claim that Africans brought "disunion" upon the country, incredulously blaming the victims for their own enslavement. Then, the audience is introduced to the blissful Cameron family, a brood of Southern planters living in the proverbial lap of luxury. Repeatedly, the audience is shown harmonious imagery, to suggest once-happy times and to foreshadow the figurative storm just over the horizon: Family members embracing and kissing each other repeatedly, a hinting at future romance in the cotton fields (as smiling slaves work dutifully in the background), even frolicking pets on the front porch.
Then begin the truly disturbing images. After a title screen that mentions a "two-hour interval" for dinner for the slaves - perhaps to suggest by some bizarre logic that they were somehow fortunate in their enslavement - we are shown a boisterous scene in which Africans have congregated outdoors en masse to dance and play uproariously, with exaggerated smiles and motions to possibly suggest an innate immaturity that requires paternalism on the part of the white South for their continued survival. The scene concludes with a gleeful handshake between a black and a white, as if sealing the unspoken agreement of race roles: master and servant, superior and inferior. The underlying message here is such: Once upon a time, We (the white South) were happy, the slaves were happy, a kind of "Don't fix it if it ain't broke" mentality.
But then, from the film's perspective, the North proceeds to break it. We see Abraham Lincoln bowing under the pressure to sign a law authorizing the federal government to intervene in the affairs of the states on the issue of abolitionism, with scores of politicians hovering over him like vultures as he readies his ink quill pen. Afterwards, as the men recede into the background, the President dabs his forehead and eyes with a handkerchief, to suggest his inner disapproval. Next, we are introduced to the "villain" in the story, a Thaddeus Stevens-look-alike who bumbles with his hairpiece and falls prey to the charms of a female mulatto housekeeper, a vindictive character thus proven by her spitting at the back of an unwavering male that spurns her advances. Her involvement as an influential "devil" on Stevens' shoulder is cemented later on, in the second act of the film.
At the prospect of future conflict with the Northern aggressors, the South romanticizes war by staging bonfires and hosting extravagant ballroom affairs on the eve of battle, to again suggest the pageantry and purity of the Southern way of life. The following morning, the Confederate troops depart amongst cheering and waving onlookers (even their slaves cheer in approval) with bugles blaring. Accompanied by a triumphant musical score playing in the background, an affectionate father points out a patriotic banner to his adoring child over a threshold, which reads: "Our cause is just."
Two years later, the war is going badly for the Confederates. The Southern town of Piedmont is raided by black troops (who appear childish and poorly-trained) led by a white "scalawag" sergeant, the Cameron home is invaded and trashed, and the family females hide in a storage room in the cellar, fearful for their safety. As expected, the Confederates honorably come to the rescue, storm the house and restore order to the town, symbolically saving the sexual purity of Southern women, a theme that is heavily relied upon in Act Two.
The film then transports us to the warfront, which titles promote as "the breeder of hate" and "useless," where the "Little Colonel" - one of the three Cameron sons fighting on behalf of the South - shows such heroism and bravery on the battlefield that even the Unionists applaud his efforts, an opposing officer sparing his life out of sheer doting admiration. Obviously, the point of all this is simple: To clearly define the "good" and "bad" sides, to suggest that men as honorable and self-sacrificing as the Little Colonel - which implies the Confederates and their cause - could not possibly be on the wrong side of history, conveniently ignoring the immorality of slavery itself. The film goes as far as to bring the divine into the fray, as just prior to the Colonel charging off into certain death at the hands of the Union forces, the camera cuts to the Cameron patriarch praying on a Bible, suggesting that it was "God's Will" that the Confederates prevail in this battle, or perhaps worse: That God had a grander purpose in sparing the life of the Cameron son, so that he would one day form the Klan.
In Act Two, the racist stereotypes and innuendos increase tenfold. The opening title of the second act begins with a quote from President Woodrow Wilson, praising the KKK. President Lincoln, oddly portrayed as the "Best Friend of the South" (considering the earlier scene in which he approved the legislation that started the war) and the final buffer shielding them from Northern Radicals like Stevens, has already been assassinated. As a result, Stevens - or Stoneman, as he is called in the film - becomes a "king" and bane of the South, promoting the mulatto housekeeper to a higher position of trusted confidant, perhaps lover. In his chambers with his loyal Northern minions, Stoneman proclaims a male mulatto named Lynch (coincidence?), "the equal of any white man" and summarily dispatches him to Piedmont to tell the Freedmen to stop working, show disrespect to the white man, call for black suffrage and advocate interracial marriage, which reflects a deep-seeded racist fear of black sexuality that is a repeated theme in the second half of the film, and will be addressed again later.
The pace increases, and so do the stereotypes and historical inaccuracies. Freedmen get the vote, and black troops are shown forcefully discriminating against whites at the voting booth to put blacks in office. These newly-elected Freedmen representatives are shown sleeping in their seats irresponsibly, drinking alcohol and cheering uproariously at the passage of a bill that would allow intermarriage, again aiming for that age-old racist nerve. Then, in an unrelated scene, a black magistrate appeals to an all-black jury in a court of law over the fate of a black suspect, who they let free, making two libelous insinuations simultaneously: One, that Freedmen would allow criminals to roam the streets unchecked to commit future crimes on the basis of race, and two, that Blacks are simply not suited to serve as either judge or jury, the exclusive territory of the white man. Speaking of territory, Lynch shows a libidinous interest in a white woman - who also happens to be the love interest of Colonel Cameron, which establishes a love triangle to further justify white reaction in response - but this is minor compared to the introduction of the character of Gus, the black sexual predator.
Unintentionally, the film serves to expose the true character of white racism, in that it depicts the ultimate motivating fear behind the hatred, at its core: The threat of sexual relations between black men and white women. This is never clearer than when Nation reveals Gus, a white actor in blackface, stalking the Colonel's younger sister. Emboldened by Lynch and the new law allowing intermarriage, Gus lurks in the shadows seedily, waiting for the prefect opportunity to pounce. Eventually, a chase scene on foot ensues to the edge of a cliff, from which the sister would prefer to jump to her death than submit to Gus' advances, an "honorable" choice. As a result of this and all the aforementioned "injustices" perpetuated against the white race, the honorable Colonel forms the Klu Klux Klan to restore the honor of the South and that of white womanhood, and the film effectively makes heroes out of villains.
In conclusion, a technical masterpiece ... but a historical travesty.
The American "Triumph of Will".......2007-06-14
Viewing this movie is kind of like what it would be to see a sculpture by Michelangelo glorifying rape or verse by Shakespeare aggrandizing murder...
To say today that we cannot recognize the wrongs of the past or their depiction in art or literature is not an elevation of free speech but rather a limitation on our free speech.
We not only have the right but the duty to recognize what was wrong in the past and call it for what it was.
In this film D.W. Griffiths attempted to dramatically portray the justifiable rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Its release and presentation resulted in a sort of segregationist passion play that both spiked Klan membership (which peeked at over a million in the mid 1920s) and reinvigorated violence against African Americans (including a sharp rise in lynchings in the American south).
The film premiered during the administration of Woodrow Wilson who resegregated the American military (which had originally been desegregated under Abraham Lincoln and would not again be desegreated until the administration of Harry S Truman). It accompanied a phenonomenal rolling back of the clock for American egalitarianism and helped set the stage for what would become another fifty years of injustice for African Americans.
To be sure, watch the movie and witness its technical accomplishments. But beware of the evil that occurs when genius is placed in service of madness.
Learn from history to better avoid its errors.
For study, not entertainment........2007-04-19
It is true that this film was a great leap foward in the technical development of motion pictures. However, D. W. Griffith was too smart a man to NOT know what the story was about (based on "The Clansman", hello). Critics who like the film either already decided that it was a cinema classic before they saw it or are in some way racist themselves. The film is not subtle in how it poorly portrays blacks, and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan is not an unfortunate footnote to the story, it's the Finale! It can't even be said to be a reflection of the time in which it was made because it met with protests when it was released (this at a time when blacks were still second class citizens!). Griffith was a wizard with a camera and the film may be looked at for that, but only that.
Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!.......2007-03-30
The Director / Producer does a good job of this
up-to-the-minute cinematically modern (for it's
day) film, that takes a simpathetic look at the
Southern States. However, his mildly racist and
Pro Masonic proclivities come through as well.
A Pity. The Abe Lincoln in here unfortunatety
look like an 19th century pawn broker, with his
overdone makeup! The KKK part (a racist organi-
zation started by the masonic lodge) is stupid!
They never 'saved' anybody, and the Masonic Lodge
itself (which the KKKluxos Adolphus covered for)
has damned many mens (women's and even Children's
souls - the DeMolays)actually to hell! Still, for
it's time, until the KKKlan KKKlowns come riding
into the pic, is worth the watch. D.W. Griffith
could never get it released today! So get a cheap
VHS copy of it, erase the KKK part from then on
on the film and you have as close to a silent 4
star movie as you ever will. Just git your teeth
on the stereotypical parts of 'buck' dancing
negroes!
Average customer rating:
- The Birth of a Nation
- Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer.
- The American "Triumph of Will"
- For study, not entertainment.
- Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!
|
The Birth of a Nation
Starring:
Spottiswoode Aitken ,
Mary Alden ,
George Beranger ,
Elmer Clifton , and
Miriam Cooper
Manufacturer: Delta
ProductGroup: DVD
Binding: DVD
General
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Drama
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Documentary
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Cooper, Miriam
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Crisp, Donald
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Gish, Lillian
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Harron, Robert
| ( H )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Lewis, Ralph
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Long, Walter
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Marsh, Mae
| ( M )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Reid, Wallace
| ( R )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Walthall, Henry B
| ( W )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 Drama
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 All DVDs
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
DVDs Under $7.49
| Today's Deals in DVD
| Special Features
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Today's Deals in DVD
| Special Features
| DVD
| Video
( B )
| Titles
| Features
| DVD
| Video
Similar Items:
-
Battleship Potemkin
-
Metropolis (Restored Authorized Edition)
-
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
-
Intolerance (1916) (Silent) (B&W)
-
Citizen Kane
ASIN: B0001EFTRE
Release Date: 2004-03-10 |
Amazon.com essential video
A pivotal moment in film history. After The Birth of a Nation, nothing was the same: not the way audiences watched movies, not the way filmmakers created them. D.W. Griffith's jumbo-size saga of the Civil War expanded the boundaries of storytelling on the screen, conveying a richer, more complicated (and certainly longer) tale than anyone had seen in a movie before. The delicate relationships, the sad passage of time, the spectacular battle scenes all look as fresh and innovative today as they did in 1915. So do Griffith's brilliant actors, most of them--including favorite leading lady Lillian Gish--drawn from his regular stock company. What has become increasingly problematic about The Birth of a Nation is Griffith's condescending attitude toward black slaves, and the ringing excitement surrounding the founding of the Ku Klux Klan. Griffith, whose political ideas were naive at best, seemed genuinely surprised by the criticism of his masterwork, and for his next project he turned to the humanist preaching of the massive Intolerance. Despite protests, Birth sold more tickets than any other movie, a record that stood for decades, and President Woodrow Wilson famously compared it to "history written in lightning." That judgment has lasted. --Robert Horton
Description
One of the most important and technically advanced films of all time, famed American film pioneer, D.W. Griffith's The Birth of a Nation is well renowned not only for its brilliant cinematography, innovative editing, and superb acting, but also because of its racist portrayal of African Americans and sympathetic depiction of the Ku Klux Klan. Featured on AFI's list of "Best Films of the 20th Century." Includes collectible poster
Customer Reviews:
The Birth of a Nation.......2007-08-31
A good educational film for "the way we were" Definitely a must for film makers
Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer........2007-08-10
The use of changing camera angles, breathtaking battle scenes involving literally hundreds of actors and extras, and manipulating colored lens filters to alter the mood were revolutionary techniques during an age when moving pictures was still in its infancy, as the 1915 film is a visual masterpiece.
Sadly, beneath this masterful portrayal of the Civil War and the ensuing Reconstruction period lies a treacherous ulterior motive: To serve as justification for the formation and existence of the Klu Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization that uses terror, violence and murder to advance its racist agenda.
The three-hour silent film has two acts - much like a theatre production with an intermission - the first of which begins by introducing main characters and setting the stage for the War from the social and political perspective of the Confederate South. However, from almost the first frame the wheels of propaganda begin to turn. Immediately following the introductory titles, words on the screen claim that Africans brought "disunion" upon the country, incredulously blaming the victims for their own enslavement. Then, the audience is introduced to the blissful Cameron family, a brood of Southern planters living in the proverbial lap of luxury. Repeatedly, the audience is shown harmonious imagery, to suggest once-happy times and to foreshadow the figurative storm just over the horizon: Family members embracing and kissing each other repeatedly, a hinting at future romance in the cotton fields (as smiling slaves work dutifully in the background), even frolicking pets on the front porch.
Then begin the truly disturbing images. After a title screen that mentions a "two-hour interval" for dinner for the slaves - perhaps to suggest by some bizarre logic that they were somehow fortunate in their enslavement - we are shown a boisterous scene in which Africans have congregated outdoors en masse to dance and play uproariously, with exaggerated smiles and motions to possibly suggest an innate immaturity that requires paternalism on the part of the white South for their continued survival. The scene concludes with a gleeful handshake between a black and a white, as if sealing the unspoken agreement of race roles: master and servant, superior and inferior. The underlying message here is such: Once upon a time, We (the white South) were happy, the slaves were happy, a kind of "Don't fix it if it ain't broke" mentality.
But then, from the film's perspective, the North proceeds to break it. We see Abraham Lincoln bowing under the pressure to sign a law authorizing the federal government to intervene in the affairs of the states on the issue of abolitionism, with scores of politicians hovering over him like vultures as he readies his ink quill pen. Afterwards, as the men recede into the background, the President dabs his forehead and eyes with a handkerchief, to suggest his inner disapproval. Next, we are introduced to the "villain" in the story, a Thaddeus Stevens-look-alike who bumbles with his hairpiece and falls prey to the charms of a female mulatto housekeeper, a vindictive character thus proven by her spitting at the back of an unwavering male that spurns her advances. Her involvement as an influential "devil" on Stevens' shoulder is cemented later on, in the second act of the film.
At the prospect of future conflict with the Northern aggressors, the South romanticizes war by staging bonfires and hosting extravagant ballroom affairs on the eve of battle, to again suggest the pageantry and purity of the Southern way of life. The following morning, the Confederate troops depart amongst cheering and waving onlookers (even their slaves cheer in approval) with bugles blaring. Accompanied by a triumphant musical score playing in the background, an affectionate father points out a patriotic banner to his adoring child over a threshold, which reads: "Our cause is just."
Two years later, the war is going badly for the Confederates. The Southern town of Piedmont is raided by black troops (who appear childish and poorly-trained) led by a white "scalawag" sergeant, the Cameron home is invaded and trashed, and the family females hide in a storage room in the cellar, fearful for their safety. As expected, the Confederates honorably come to the rescue, storm the house and restore order to the town, symbolically saving the sexual purity of Southern women, a theme that is heavily relied upon in Act Two.
The film then transports us to the warfront, which titles promote as "the breeder of hate" and "useless," where the "Little Colonel" - one of the three Cameron sons fighting on behalf of the South - shows such heroism and bravery on the battlefield that even the Unionists applaud his efforts, an opposing officer sparing his life out of sheer doting admiration. Obviously, the point of all this is simple: To clearly define the "good" and "bad" sides, to suggest that men as honorable and self-sacrificing as the Little Colonel - which implies the Confederates and their cause - could not possibly be on the wrong side of history, conveniently ignoring the immorality of slavery itself. The film goes as far as to bring the divine into the fray, as just prior to the Colonel charging off into certain death at the hands of the Union forces, the camera cuts to the Cameron patriarch praying on a Bible, suggesting that it was "God's Will" that the Confederates prevail in this battle, or perhaps worse: That God had a grander purpose in sparing the life of the Cameron son, so that he would one day form the Klan.
In Act Two, the racist stereotypes and innuendos increase tenfold. The opening title of the second act begins with a quote from President Woodrow Wilson, praising the KKK. President Lincoln, oddly portrayed as the "Best Friend of the South" (considering the earlier scene in which he approved the legislation that started the war) and the final buffer shielding them from Northern Radicals like Stevens, has already been assassinated. As a result, Stevens - or Stoneman, as he is called in the film - becomes a "king" and bane of the South, promoting the mulatto housekeeper to a higher position of trusted confidant, perhaps lover. In his chambers with his loyal Northern minions, Stoneman proclaims a male mulatto named Lynch (coincidence?), "the equal of any white man" and summarily dispatches him to Piedmont to tell the Freedmen to stop working, show disrespect to the white man, call for black suffrage and advocate interracial marriage, which reflects a deep-seeded racist fear of black sexuality that is a repeated theme in the second half of the film, and will be addressed again later.
The pace increases, and so do the stereotypes and historical inaccuracies. Freedmen get the vote, and black troops are shown forcefully discriminating against whites at the voting booth to put blacks in office. These newly-elected Freedmen representatives are shown sleeping in their seats irresponsibly, drinking alcohol and cheering uproariously at the passage of a bill that would allow intermarriage, again aiming for that age-old racist nerve. Then, in an unrelated scene, a black magistrate appeals to an all-black jury in a court of law over the fate of a black suspect, who they let free, making two libelous insinuations simultaneously: One, that Freedmen would allow criminals to roam the streets unchecked to commit future crimes on the basis of race, and two, that Blacks are simply not suited to serve as either judge or jury, the exclusive territory of the white man. Speaking of territory, Lynch shows a libidinous interest in a white woman - who also happens to be the love interest of Colonel Cameron, which establishes a love triangle to further justify white reaction in response - but this is minor compared to the introduction of the character of Gus, the black sexual predator.
Unintentionally, the film serves to expose the true character of white racism, in that it depicts the ultimate motivating fear behind the hatred, at its core: The threat of sexual relations between black men and white women. This is never clearer than when Nation reveals Gus, a white actor in blackface, stalking the Colonel's younger sister. Emboldened by Lynch and the new law allowing intermarriage, Gus lurks in the shadows seedily, waiting for the prefect opportunity to pounce. Eventually, a chase scene on foot ensues to the edge of a cliff, from which the sister would prefer to jump to her death than submit to Gus' advances, an "honorable" choice. As a result of this and all the aforementioned "injustices" perpetuated against the white race, the honorable Colonel forms the Klu Klux Klan to restore the honor of the South and that of white womanhood, and the film effectively makes heroes out of villains.
In conclusion, a technical masterpiece ... but a historical travesty.
The American "Triumph of Will".......2007-06-14
Viewing this movie is kind of like what it would be to see a sculpture by Michelangelo glorifying rape or verse by Shakespeare aggrandizing murder...
To say today that we cannot recognize the wrongs of the past or their depiction in art or literature is not an elevation of free speech but rather a limitation on our free speech.
We not only have the right but the duty to recognize what was wrong in the past and call it for what it was.
In this film D.W. Griffiths attempted to dramatically portray the justifiable rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Its release and presentation resulted in a sort of segregationist passion play that both spiked Klan membership (which peeked at over a million in the mid 1920s) and reinvigorated violence against African Americans (including a sharp rise in lynchings in the American south).
The film premiered during the administration of Woodrow Wilson who resegregated the American military (which had originally been desegregated under Abraham Lincoln and would not again be desegreated until the administration of Harry S Truman). It accompanied a phenonomenal rolling back of the clock for American egalitarianism and helped set the stage for what would become another fifty years of injustice for African Americans.
To be sure, watch the movie and witness its technical accomplishments. But beware of the evil that occurs when genius is placed in service of madness.
Learn from history to better avoid its errors.
For study, not entertainment........2007-04-19
It is true that this film was a great leap foward in the technical development of motion pictures. However, D. W. Griffith was too smart a man to NOT know what the story was about (based on "The Clansman", hello). Critics who like the film either already decided that it was a cinema classic before they saw it or are in some way racist themselves. The film is not subtle in how it poorly portrays blacks, and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan is not an unfortunate footnote to the story, it's the Finale! It can't even be said to be a reflection of the time in which it was made because it met with protests when it was released (this at a time when blacks were still second class citizens!). Griffith was a wizard with a camera and the film may be looked at for that, but only that.
Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!.......2007-03-30
The Director / Producer does a good job of this
up-to-the-minute cinematically modern (for it's
day) film, that takes a simpathetic look at the
Southern States. However, his mildly racist and
Pro Masonic proclivities come through as well.
A Pity. The Abe Lincoln in here unfortunatety
look like an 19th century pawn broker, with his
overdone makeup! The KKK part (a racist organi-
zation started by the masonic lodge) is stupid!
They never 'saved' anybody, and the Masonic Lodge
itself (which the KKKluxos Adolphus covered for)
has damned many mens (women's and even Children's
souls - the DeMolays)actually to hell! Still, for
it's time, until the KKKlan KKKlowns come riding
into the pic, is worth the watch. D.W. Griffith
could never get it released today! So get a cheap
VHS copy of it, erase the KKK part from then on
on the film and you have as close to a silent 4
star movie as you ever will. Just git your teeth
on the stereotypical parts of 'buck' dancing
negroes!
Description
The first true film, a lavish Civil War epic in which Griffith virtually invented the basics of film grammar. Two brothers, Phil and Ted Stoneman, visit their friends in Piedmont, South Carolina: the family Cameron. This friendship is affected by the Civil War, as the Stonemans and the Camerons must join up opposite armies. The consequences of the War in their lives are shown in connection to major historical events, like the development of the Civil War itself, Lincoln's assassination, and the birth of the Klu Klux Klan. Still a rouser, and of great historical interest. Silent with music score. Battle scenes and reconstruction period recreated along with touching scenes of family reunion.
Customer Reviews:
Birth of A Nation: a devastating commentary on the KKK.......2007-03-31
Birth of a Nation is director D.W. Griffith's powerful but violently controversial masterwork depicting the post-U.S. Civil War experiences of two families, the Stonehams of Pennsylvania and the Camerons of Virginia. The Stonehams (fictional replacements for the very real Radical Republican Congressman Thaddeus Stephens and his family) revel in the North's victory and the imposition of abolitionist policies in the South. The Camerons are depicted as put-upon defeated Southerners trying desperately to preserve the beliefs and morality of the Old South. Portrayed as victims of Northern aggression, the Camerons are beset by newly freed slaves who threaten their lives and livelihoods, including attempting a rape (a controversial subject in 1915 film making) by a former slave of one of the Cameron daughters. Riding to the "rescue" of Southern womanhood is the "heroic" Ku Klux Klan, Hell-bent on preserving the South and driving out the invading Northern carpetbaggers and subjugating the newly freed slaves.
The debates that have raged over this film have focused on the depiction of the KKK as a heroic organization and of Northerners as aggressive and vicious conquerers, equating all Northerners with the barbaric hordes who destroyed "noble" Rome. Controversy has focused on whether Southern-born Griffiths was himself a racist and deliberately depicted the KKK in a positive light or was the film meant to be an ironic rendering of Thomas Dixon's racist play, "The Clansman" There can be no denying that "Birth of A Nation" is a powerful film about a violent period in post-Civil War US history. It is a film that bears watching, not only for the story of the film itself but also for it's reflections of the virulent racism present in US society in the years prior to the US entry into WWI.
[...].
Amazon.com
Although the DVDs included in Griffith Masterworks are available separately, they gain even greater significance in this stupendous boxed-set compilation. The title is no understatement: These four features and 30 short films comprise the crowning achievements in D.W. Griffith's pioneering legacy, spanning the director's progress from cinematic innovator (the Biograph shorts, 1909-13) to his ambitious creation of the controversial epics The Birth of a Nation (1915) and Intolerance (1916), and his mastery of the emotionally intense melodramas Broken Blossoms (1919) and Orphans of the Storm (1921). Griffith's artistic growth is evident throughout, as he moves from the static camera of the Biograph years to his groundbreaking development of cinematic grammar including close-ups, parallel editing, and mobile-camera action. The historical importance of these films has long been established; they're available here in the best available condition, carefully preserved with the illuminating perspective of history.
That perspective extends to the set's impressive bonus features, representing an unprecedented wealth of archival material exclusive to these DVDs. Appropriately, The Birth of a Nation is closely examined through vintage and latter-day materials, including a peculiar 1930 prologue featuring Walter Huston and Griffith himself, musing over the film's ongoing battle with censorship; archival documents further examine the charges of racism that plagued the film for decades. Other highlights include Lillian Gish's introduction to Broken Blossoms, filmed for the 1970s TV series The Silent Years; two filmed introductions featuring Orson Welles (for Intolerance and Orphans of the Storm); and a rare look at Griffith acting in the 1908 short "Rescued from the Eagle's Nest." A veritable goldmine for home or classroom viewing, Griffith Masterworks is an essential addition to any collection of classic silent cinema. --Jeff Shannon
Customer Reviews:
Stunning DVD Quality.......2006-11-29
Hi, D.W. Griffith fans. I am not particularly a very big fan of D.W. Griffith, but my aunt knew I liked silents so she got it for me for getting good grades. I was pleased, but COME AWWN! D.W. GRIFFITH IS NOT VERY INTERESTING, EVEN FOR ME, A SILENT-LOVING KID! I woul've preffered IT, starring Clara Bow, but this collection is pretty good. BIRTH OF A NATION is extremely racist. I only reccomend buying this if you've seen some of his work before. It might shock you. I liked INTOLERANCE best. It is a lovely movie with a great story. ALL FILMS IN THIS COLLECTION ARE RESTORED BEAUTIFULLY AND LOOK GREAT! SOME OF THE BEST RESTORATION WORK I'VE EVER SEEN! There are some nice rare Biograph shorts that are work watching. I watch any of these movies on Jan. 22, becuase that is D.W. Griffith's birthday. Did you know that musical movie star June Knight shares his birthday? She is my fave actress, and I reccomend that you watch her movie Brodway Melody of 1936, MY FAVORITE MOVIE, if like musicals and you want to see Robert Taylor sing in a movie for his first and last time.
IN RESPONSE TO ART FOR HATES SAKE.......2006-09-03
THESE FILMS ARE A LOOK AT HISTORY. NOTHING MORE. THEY ARE NOT AN ENDORSEMENT. BUT I GUESS THATS THE KIND OF REACTION WE COULD EXPECT FROM SOME FRUITCAKE FROM SAN FRANCISCO.
Amazing, bravo!.......2006-07-23
Though i am only thirteen i have had a passion for movies ever since i was young and have been increasing my collection (upwards of 400 now) of fantastic movies, this is one of my finest additions. D W Griffiths work may have been racist or one sided but his work changed world film, one of these movies even made the American Film Institute's(AFI) Top One Hundred Films of the past 100 Years ( Birth of a Nation)! All of these movies (except Biograph shorts 1909-1913) made the their way into the book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, and for me to find them all together was a dream come true. If you are a movie fan who is interested in the silent film era do yourself a favor and make this fantastic addition to your collection today.
-Movie Man 22
Art for Hate's Sake.......2006-05-26
Why do those who rave about Griffith's cinematography never seem to notice that it was all in the service of racism, Southern sectional mythology, and American exceptionalism? The Birth of a Nation is a pernicious slander on the ex-slaves and the brave few from the north who tried (and failed) to reconstruct the South. Had they succeeded, we wouldn't be lost in the Bushes now. Art MUST be judged on its message as well as its manners. I notice, by the way, that even Disney has shown some signs of shame over the studio's unabashed racism of yesteryear; The Song of the South (Uncle Remus tales) is NOT available. I'm not urging censorship of Griffith, nor of Gone With The Wind and other pernicious propaganda films, any more than repression of Leni Reifenstahl's Triumph of the Will. I merely want the next generation of film critics to be appropriately aghast.
A Comment about "His Trust".......2006-04-10
"His Trust" was the fourth of Griffith's first seven Civil War Shorts. Actually there were only six, "His Trust" was the only two-reeler and against Griffith's wishes Biograph released it serially, calling the second reel "His Trust Fulfilled". It lacks the charm of the remaining five shorts and is painfully cornball in comparison to most of Griffith's Biograph work.
Wilfred Lucus (in blackface) plays George, a faithful Negro servant entrusted by his owner with the welfare of his wife and young daughter when he goes off to fight for the South. Predictibly the owner dies in a nicely staged battle sequence, union soldiers burn the mansion in a poorly staged arson sequence, and George rescues the daughter and his master's sword. The daughter grows up in George's cabin. In the second reel George pays for her education at a seminary, and resists the temptation to steal when his money runs out. She eventually marries her "cousin" (seriously) and George gets to keep the sword.
Although a rather weak story, "His Trust" is significant for several reasons. It's subject, a southern family reduced to poverty by the war mirrors Griffith's own situation. Griffith's father served in Kentucky's "Orphan Brigade" during the Civil War and the family never really recovered from the financial setbacks that resulted.
It's hero, a "good Negro", is portrayed affectionately-if somewhat patronizingly; a precursor of what was to come in "Birth of a Nation".
Finally, "His Trust" was Griffith's first foray outside the world of single reel shorts. Griffith was pressing Biograph for funding to do longer films. Other studios had already released the five reel "Life of Moses", a four reel "Les Miserables", and a three reel version of "Uncle Tom's Cabin". Biograph's resistance to the concept of longer films would eventually be a factor in Griffith's split with his original studio, a production house that owed its #1 reputation to Griffith's vision and innovation.
Even in 1910 Griffith seemingly had grasped the change that was taking place as feature length films would not be released serially but would play as extended showings in legitimate theaters.
Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
Average customer rating:
- The Birth of a Nation
- Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer.
- The American "Triumph of Will"
- For study, not entertainment.
- Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!
|
The Birth of a Nation & The Civil War Films of D.W. Griffith
Starring:
Spottiswoode Aitken ,
Mary Alden ,
George Beranger ,
Elmer Clifton , and
Miriam Cooper
Manufacturer: Kino Video
ProductGroup: DVD
Binding: DVD
General
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Drama
| Silent Films
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Silent Films
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Drama
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Documentary
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Cooper, Miriam
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Crisp, Donald
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Gish, Lillian
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Harron, Robert
| ( H )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Lewis, Ralph
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Long, Walter
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Marsh, Mae
| ( M )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Reid, Wallace
| ( R )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Walthall, Henry B
| ( W )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
( B )
| Titles
| Features
| DVD
| Video
Similar Items:
-
Battleship Potemkin
-
Metropolis (Restored Authorized Edition)
-
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
-
Intolerance (1916) (Silent) (B&W)
-
Citizen Kane
ASIN: B00007CVS7
Release Date: 2002-12-10 |
Amazon.com essential video
A pivotal moment in film history. After The Birth of a Nation, nothing was the same: not the way audiences watched movies, not the way filmmakers created them. D.W. Griffith's jumbo-size saga of the Civil War expanded the boundaries of storytelling on the screen, conveying a richer, more complicated (and certainly longer) tale than anyone had seen in a movie before. The delicate relationships, the sad passage of time, the spectacular battle scenes all look as fresh and innovative today as they did in 1915. So do Griffith's brilliant actors, most of them--including favorite leading lady Lillian Gish--drawn from his regular stock company. What has become increasingly problematic about The Birth of a Nation is Griffith's condescending attitude toward black slaves, and the ringing excitement surrounding the founding of the Ku Klux Klan. Griffith, whose political ideas were naive at best, seemed genuinely surprised by the criticism of his masterwork, and for his next project he turned to the humanist preaching of the massive Intolerance. Despite protests, Birth sold more tickets than any other movie, a record that stood for decades, and President Woodrow Wilson famously compared it to "history written in lightning." That judgment has lasted. --Robert Horton
Customer Reviews:
The Birth of a Nation.......2007-08-31
A good educational film for "the way we were" Definitely a must for film makers
Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer........2007-08-10
The use of changing camera angles, breathtaking battle scenes involving literally hundreds of actors and extras, and manipulating colored lens filters to alter the mood were revolutionary techniques during an age when moving pictures was still in its infancy, as the 1915 film is a visual masterpiece.
Sadly, beneath this masterful portrayal of the Civil War and the ensuing Reconstruction period lies a treacherous ulterior motive: To serve as justification for the formation and existence of the Klu Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization that uses terror, violence and murder to advance its racist agenda.
The three-hour silent film has two acts - much like a theatre production with an intermission - the first of which begins by introducing main characters and setting the stage for the War from the social and political perspective of the Confederate South. However, from almost the first frame the wheels of propaganda begin to turn. Immediately following the introductory titles, words on the screen claim that Africans brought "disunion" upon the country, incredulously blaming the victims for their own enslavement. Then, the audience is introduced to the blissful Cameron family, a brood of Southern planters living in the proverbial lap of luxury. Repeatedly, the audience is shown harmonious imagery, to suggest once-happy times and to foreshadow the figurative storm just over the horizon: Family members embracing and kissing each other repeatedly, a hinting at future romance in the cotton fields (as smiling slaves work dutifully in the background), even frolicking pets on the front porch.
Then begin the truly disturbing images. After a title screen that mentions a "two-hour interval" for dinner for the slaves - perhaps to suggest by some bizarre logic that they were somehow fortunate in their enslavement - we are shown a boisterous scene in which Africans have congregated outdoors en masse to dance and play uproariously, with exaggerated smiles and motions to possibly suggest an innate immaturity that requires paternalism on the part of the white South for their continued survival. The scene concludes with a gleeful handshake between a black and a white, as if sealing the unspoken agreement of race roles: master and servant, superior and inferior. The underlying message here is such: Once upon a time, We (the white South) were happy, the slaves were happy, a kind of "Don't fix it if it ain't broke" mentality.
But then, from the film's perspective, the North proceeds to break it. We see Abraham Lincoln bowing under the pressure to sign a law authorizing the federal government to intervene in the affairs of the states on the issue of abolitionism, with scores of politicians hovering over him like vultures as he readies his ink quill pen. Afterwards, as the men recede into the background, the President dabs his forehead and eyes with a handkerchief, to suggest his inner disapproval. Next, we are introduced to the "villain" in the story, a Thaddeus Stevens-look-alike who bumbles with his hairpiece and falls prey to the charms of a female mulatto housekeeper, a vindictive character thus proven by her spitting at the back of an unwavering male that spurns her advances. Her involvement as an influential "devil" on Stevens' shoulder is cemented later on, in the second act of the film.
At the prospect of future conflict with the Northern aggressors, the South romanticizes war by staging bonfires and hosting extravagant ballroom affairs on the eve of battle, to again suggest the pageantry and purity of the Southern way of life. The following morning, the Confederate troops depart amongst cheering and waving onlookers (even their slaves cheer in approval) with bugles blaring. Accompanied by a triumphant musical score playing in the background, an affectionate father points out a patriotic banner to his adoring child over a threshold, which reads: "Our cause is just."
Two years later, the war is going badly for the Confederates. The Southern town of Piedmont is raided by black troops (who appear childish and poorly-trained) led by a white "scalawag" sergeant, the Cameron home is invaded and trashed, and the family females hide in a storage room in the cellar, fearful for their safety. As expected, the Confederates honorably come to the rescue, storm the house and restore order to the town, symbolically saving the sexual purity of Southern women, a theme that is heavily relied upon in Act Two.
The film then transports us to the warfront, which titles promote as "the breeder of hate" and "useless," where the "Little Colonel" - one of the three Cameron sons fighting on behalf of the South - shows such heroism and bravery on the battlefield that even the Unionists applaud his efforts, an opposing officer sparing his life out of sheer doting admiration. Obviously, the point of all this is simple: To clearly define the "good" and "bad" sides, to suggest that men as honorable and self-sacrificing as the Little Colonel - which implies the Confederates and their cause - could not possibly be on the wrong side of history, conveniently ignoring the immorality of slavery itself. The film goes as far as to bring the divine into the fray, as just prior to the Colonel charging off into certain death at the hands of the Union forces, the camera cuts to the Cameron patriarch praying on a Bible, suggesting that it was "God's Will" that the Confederates prevail in this battle, or perhaps worse: That God had a grander purpose in sparing the life of the Cameron son, so that he would one day form the Klan.
In Act Two, the racist stereotypes and innuendos increase tenfold. The opening title of the second act begins with a quote from President Woodrow Wilson, praising the KKK. President Lincoln, oddly portrayed as the "Best Friend of the South" (considering the earlier scene in which he approved the legislation that started the war) and the final buffer shielding them from Northern Radicals like Stevens, has already been assassinated. As a result, Stevens - or Stoneman, as he is called in the film - becomes a "king" and bane of the South, promoting the mulatto housekeeper to a higher position of trusted confidant, perhaps lover. In his chambers with his loyal Northern minions, Stoneman proclaims a male mulatto named Lynch (coincidence?), "the equal of any white man" and summarily dispatches him to Piedmont to tell the Freedmen to stop working, show disrespect to the white man, call for black suffrage and advocate interracial marriage, which reflects a deep-seeded racist fear of black sexuality that is a repeated theme in the second half of the film, and will be addressed again later.
The pace increases, and so do the stereotypes and historical inaccuracies. Freedmen get the vote, and black troops are shown forcefully discriminating against whites at the voting booth to put blacks in office. These newly-elected Freedmen representatives are shown sleeping in their seats irresponsibly, drinking alcohol and cheering uproariously at the passage of a bill that would allow intermarriage, again aiming for that age-old racist nerve. Then, in an unrelated scene, a black magistrate appeals to an all-black jury in a court of law over the fate of a black suspect, who they let free, making two libelous insinuations simultaneously: One, that Freedmen would allow criminals to roam the streets unchecked to commit future crimes on the basis of race, and two, that Blacks are simply not suited to serve as either judge or jury, the exclusive territory of the white man. Speaking of territory, Lynch shows a libidinous interest in a white woman - who also happens to be the love interest of Colonel Cameron, which establishes a love triangle to further justify white reaction in response - but this is minor compared to the introduction of the character of Gus, the black sexual predator.
Unintentionally, the film serves to expose the true character of white racism, in that it depicts the ultimate motivating fear behind the hatred, at its core: The threat of sexual relations between black men and white women. This is never clearer than when Nation reveals Gus, a white actor in blackface, stalking the Colonel's younger sister. Emboldened by Lynch and the new law allowing intermarriage, Gus lurks in the shadows seedily, waiting for the prefect opportunity to pounce. Eventually, a chase scene on foot ensues to the edge of a cliff, from which the sister would prefer to jump to her death than submit to Gus' advances, an "honorable" choice. As a result of this and all the aforementioned "injustices" perpetuated against the white race, the honorable Colonel forms the Klu Klux Klan to restore the honor of the South and that of white womanhood, and the film effectively makes heroes out of villains.
In conclusion, a technical masterpiece ... but a historical travesty.
The American "Triumph of Will".......2007-06-14
Viewing this movie is kind of like what it would be to see a sculpture by Michelangelo glorifying rape or verse by Shakespeare aggrandizing murder...
To say today that we cannot recognize the wrongs of the past or their depiction in art or literature is not an elevation of free speech but rather a limitation on our free speech.
We not only have the right but the duty to recognize what was wrong in the past and call it for what it was.
In this film D.W. Griffiths attempted to dramatically portray the justifiable rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Its release and presentation resulted in a sort of segregationist passion play that both spiked Klan membership (which peeked at over a million in the mid 1920s) and reinvigorated violence against African Americans (including a sharp rise in lynchings in the American south).
The film premiered during the administration of Woodrow Wilson who resegregated the American military (which had originally been desegregated under Abraham Lincoln and would not again be desegreated until the administration of Harry S Truman). It accompanied a phenonomenal rolling back of the clock for American egalitarianism and helped set the stage for what would become another fifty years of injustice for African Americans.
To be sure, watch the movie and witness its technical accomplishments. But beware of the evil that occurs when genius is placed in service of madness.
Learn from history to better avoid its errors.
For study, not entertainment........2007-04-19
It is true that this film was a great leap foward in the technical development of motion pictures. However, D. W. Griffith was too smart a man to NOT know what the story was about (based on "The Clansman", hello). Critics who like the film either already decided that it was a cinema classic before they saw it or are in some way racist themselves. The film is not subtle in how it poorly portrays blacks, and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan is not an unfortunate footnote to the story, it's the Finale! It can't even be said to be a reflection of the time in which it was made because it met with protests when it was released (this at a time when blacks were still second class citizens!). Griffith was a wizard with a camera and the film may be looked at for that, but only that.
Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!.......2007-03-30
The Director / Producer does a good job of this
up-to-the-minute cinematically modern (for it's
day) film, that takes a simpathetic look at the
Southern States. However, his mildly racist and
Pro Masonic proclivities come through as well.
A Pity. The Abe Lincoln in here unfortunatety
look like an 19th century pawn broker, with his
overdone makeup! The KKK part (a racist organi-
zation started by the masonic lodge) is stupid!
They never 'saved' anybody, and the Masonic Lodge
itself (which the KKKluxos Adolphus covered for)
has damned many mens (women's and even Children's
souls - the DeMolays)actually to hell! Still, for
it's time, until the KKKlan KKKlowns come riding
into the pic, is worth the watch. D.W. Griffith
could never get it released today! So get a cheap
VHS copy of it, erase the KKK part from then on
on the film and you have as close to a silent 4
star movie as you ever will. Just git your teeth
on the stereotypical parts of 'buck' dancing
negroes!
Description
Sir Martin Gilbert hosts this compelling look at Israel's first three years, featuring never-before-seen footage and eyewitness accounts of the nation's birth.
Customer Reviews:
A good introduction.......2007-08-13
The use of stock footage from the era gives the viewer a "feel" for the times. Mr. Gilbert's visits to some of the locations in which fighting took place was also interesting and I hope to visit some of these spots myself before I return to the United States.
Over simplified, and incomplete.......2007-01-26
Undoubtedly it's difficult to adequately describe the history of any nation's birth in one 50 minute documentary. The History Channel and Sir Martin Gilbert made a creditable attempt. Yet, the overall result is disappointing.
As another reviewer mentioned, the film is too much comprised of historical footage major War of Independence battles--from before the Nov. 29, 1947 United Nations partition vote, before and after Israel's May 14, 1948 Declaration of Statehood, through the February, March, April and July 1949 Armistice agreements and their aftermath.
The film includes interviews with retired Jewish defenders and survivors of massacres at Kfar Etzion, Mount Scopus (Hadassah Hospital medical convoy, Apr. 13, 1948), Sha'ar HaGai and Yad Mordechai. There is also wonderful 1949 footage of post-war Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and so on shot by Briton Bernard Beecham, who visited specifically to document life in Israel's first days as a sovereign state.
On the down side, the only Arab archival footage was reportedly staged anti-Israel military propaganda. This seems imbalanced.
There are also 1948 clips of Galilee Druze and Negev Bedouins who look happy to have accepted Jewish sovereignty.
But viewers miss any adequate Arab League political or Islamic theological explanations for the refusal to accept a new Arab state alongside the Jewish one. There's only the demand of Transjordanian King Abdullah I--that Israel submit to Muslim rule, or face war.
Also missing are any extant archival radio or news clips of Arab exhortations to flee--or destruction of Israel. Possibly only the news clips survive, but the documentary missed an important opportunity to air them.
Finally, while Jewish immigration from Arab nations is mentioned in passing, the forced exodus of nearly one million Jews from Arab and Muslim nations is not reported here, nor is Israel's absorption of their vast majority. That's unfortunate, since Middle Eastern Jews had lived in Arab and Muslim countries for thousands of years, in the case of Iraq, since long before the coming of Christ.
Birth of a Nation tries, but doesn't adequately present the intricacies of Israel's founding.
A History of Violence.......2006-10-02
I was very disappointed with this film. I had hoped to learn about the "Birth of a Nation" and "prenatal" life in the region. But the entire film is about postnatal fighting.
The film is appropriate for people who find fighting to be glorious - for people who like to keep score of battles and casualties like some kind of sports game.
This ugly film depicted the entire society as being barbaric. In fact it sanctified the barbarism as being something heroic. Surely the beautiful people and the rich culture of this region deserve more than this. Surely the viewers deserve more than this History Channel pandering.
Israel: Against All Odds.......2006-04-11
the most beautiful miracle of hshem took place on may of 1948. israel became a nation once again. for 2000 years israel has been displaced and been scattered through out the nations of the world. this is the most touching,heart warming,and gut renching you will ever see on film. makes you want to sob with so much joy and relief to see the holy people of G'D coming back home to the promised land of avraham, yitzhak,and ya'akov. biblical prophecy has been fulfilled.
yehoshooah is the gratest miracle, his life and ministry, his death, and ressurection. his whole life mirrors (reflects) exactly what happened too ancient israel and the jewish inhabitants. also vice versa israel mirrors the agony, pain, and death and ressurection of our beloved masheeakh yehoshooah.
this movie makes me proud to be jewish, proud to be israeli, and joy in my heart that yehoshooah,the anointed one,and his father in heaven, the holy one of israel, made this all possible that israel would be a nation once again. against all odds israel is still a nation surrounded by arab enemies who want to destroy our country and our people. it is sad to say but true that there are christians who like the arabs feel the same way about us. yet against all odds israel is a nation and a miracle too. bruch hshem (bless G'D) and todah hshem (thank G'D) i know i do every day. i know this film will inspire people.anyone who loves freedom will love this inspiring miracle that came true and was well documented on film. after the agony, suffering,pain, and death of the holocaust joy came afterwards in may of 1948 that joy came when israel became a nation once again. sorrow comes in the evening and joy comes in the morning i have read this in the psalms of king david. the holocaust was the evening and the nation of israel was the morning when joy came to the people.
Average customer rating:
|
Birth of a Nation Silent Film Plus Bo
Starring:
Spottiswood Aitken ,
Mary Alden ,
Monte Blue ,
Miriam Cooper , and
Josephine Crowell
Director:
D.W. Griffith
Manufacturer: Alpha Video
ProductGroup: DVD
Binding: DVD
General
| Art House & International
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Drama
| By Genre
| Art House & International
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Drama
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Classics
| Drama
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Blue, Monte
| ( B )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Cooper, Miriam
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Gish, Lillian
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Gowland, Gibson
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Grasse, Sam De
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Harron, Robert
| ( H )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Lee, Jennifer
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Lewis, Ralph
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Long, Walter
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Love, Bessie
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Art House & International
| Independently Distributed
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Drama
| Independently Distributed
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 Art House & International
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 Drama
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 All DVDs
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
General
| Foreign & International
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Drama
| By Genre
| Foreign & International
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Drama
| By Genre
| Indie & Art House
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Independently Distributed
| Indie & Art House
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
DVDs Under $7.49
| Today's Deals in DVD
| Special Features
| DVD
| Video
( B )
| Titles
| Features
| DVD
| Video
Similar Items:
-
The Birth of a Nation
-
Intolerance: A Sun Play of the Ages
-
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
-
Battleship Potemkin
-
Nosferatu
ASIN: B0007TFIFG
Release Date: 2005-04-26 |
Customer Reviews:
Terrific value.......2006-11-06
This is probably the greatest dvd ever put out by one of those suggested
list price of one dollar companies. The prints on this disc aren't great - there are better - but they are actually not too lousy either; worse
prints have certainly floated through before and apparently after this
disc appeared. Aside from scene selection, though, there is nothing extra
on this dual-layer, two-sided disc. Considering, however, what the two
features are, this is obviously a must-have for anyone into building a comprehensive movie library. And since precious few who actually do buy this dvd to just see what all the controversy with "Birth Of A Nation" was
about and then actually sit through both films will ever return to either again, a dollar or two spent for both seems a very logical purchase.
Not that either of these films were ever his best work. 1915's "Birth Of A Nation" didn't really advance D.W. Griffith's art very far; he'd already mastered everything found in here with his last round or two of Biograph films. And indeed, there are several glaring continuity errors (the reappearance of a character already killed, for example) and many just plain incoherent shots. And the film's defiant 19th century white southerner viewpoint is appalling, obviously. Yet the film is definitely
fascinating as well; Griffith was indeed the master of directors when
inspired, and this film, while terribly flawed, is often truly inspired.
"Abraham Lincoln", however, is a different animal entirely, despite being
basically an extension of several scenes from the earlier film. This was
Griffith's first all-sound film, and is overall disappointing. While it's
generally true that he produced very little after 1924's masterpiece "Isn't Life Wonderful?" that compared to his earlier periods,
this is the most frustrating of them all, because this one has potential all over it; and while it seems ready to develop into Griffith classical
melodrama, it is somehow at odds with the main point of the film. Much like his earlier historical "America", much feels stilted and dry, and noone really gives an excellent performance; but at least "America" had Griffith's final significant leading lady, Carole Dempster. "Abraham Lincoln" does have several superb scenes, but an equal number of very boring and stiff scenes as well. The movie did some business but received an apathetic critical response, and for once, the critics weren't completely wrong.
The director would redeem himself on his next and final piece, 1931's "The Struggle", one of his greatest films which saw a shocking resumption of his peak powers. In retrospect, though; at the time it was a critical and commercial disaster and went largely unseen until Kino's great video release around the mid '90's (no dvd release by anyone I can tell as of the end of 2006).
And obviously having "The Struggle", Griffith's only other sound film, on this disc would be infinitely a better and more logical film set, what is on here is still, undeniably, classic stuff. Being as the prints used are pretty decent, for a mere one or two bucks you can get them on one dvd. Thats pretty awesome; and they are of course sold separately for similar bargain prices. The best introduction to Griffith as far as art is concerned would be 1916's "Intolerance", and Delta has a great, near-Kino
definitive print on dvd titled "Intolerance: A Sun Play Of The Ages". Usually sold around five or six dollars, this particular edition is rarely seen anywhere physically but is easily acquired on the web. This particular dvd copy of "Abraham Lincoln"/"Birth Of A Nation" is usually
easy to come across in store bargain bins, and preferable in fact to a couple of other issues with similar prices so try to get this release online if you can't find it locally.
Average customer rating:
- The Birth of a Nation
- Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer.
- The American "Triumph of Will"
- For study, not entertainment.
- Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!
|
The Birth of a Nation
Starring:
Spottiswoode Aitken ,
Mary Alden ,
George Beranger ,
Elmer Clifton , and
Miriam Cooper
Manufacturer: Madacy Records
ProductGroup: DVD
Binding: DVD
General
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Silent Films
| Classics
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Drama
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
General
| Westerns
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Genres
| DVD
| Video
Cooper, Miriam
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Crisp, Donald
| ( C )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Gish, Lillian
| ( G )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Harron, Robert
| ( H )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Lewis, Ralph
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Long, Walter
| ( L )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Marsh, Mae
| ( M )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Reid, Wallace
| ( R )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
Walthall, Henry B
| ( W )
| Actors & Actresses
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 Drama
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
4-for-3 All DVDs
| 4-for-3 DVD
| Stores
| DVD
| Video
( B )
| Titles
| Features
| DVD
| Video
Civil War
| Military & War
| Today's Deals in DVD
| Special Features
| DVD
| Video
Similar Items:
-
Battleship Potemkin
-
Metropolis (Restored Authorized Edition)
-
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
-
Intolerance (1916) (Silent) (B&W)
-
Citizen Kane
ASIN: B00005J75F
Release Date: 2001-05-08 |
Amazon.com essential video
A pivotal moment in film history. After The Birth of a Nation, nothing was the same: not the way audiences watched movies, not the way filmmakers created them. D.W. Griffith's jumbo-size saga of the Civil War expanded the boundaries of storytelling on the screen, conveying a richer, more complicated (and certainly longer) tale than anyone had seen in a movie before. The delicate relationships, the sad passage of time, the spectacular battle scenes all look as fresh and innovative today as they did in 1915. So do Griffith's brilliant actors, most of them--including favorite leading lady Lillian Gish--drawn from his regular stock company. What has become increasingly problematic about The Birth of a Nation is Griffith's condescending attitude toward black slaves, and the ringing excitement surrounding the founding of the Ku Klux Klan. Griffith, whose political ideas were naive at best, seemed genuinely surprised by the criticism of his masterwork, and for his next project he turned to the humanist preaching of the massive Intolerance. Despite protests, Birth sold more tickets than any other movie, a record that stood for decades, and President Woodrow Wilson famously compared it to "history written in lightning." That judgment has lasted. --Robert Horton
Customer Reviews:
The Birth of a Nation.......2007-08-31
A good educational film for "the way we were" Definitely a must for film makers
Yes, 5 stars ... but with a disclaimer........2007-08-10
The use of changing camera angles, breathtaking battle scenes involving literally hundreds of actors and extras, and manipulating colored lens filters to alter the mood were revolutionary techniques during an age when moving pictures was still in its infancy, as the 1915 film is a visual masterpiece.
Sadly, beneath this masterful portrayal of the Civil War and the ensuing Reconstruction period lies a treacherous ulterior motive: To serve as justification for the formation and existence of the Klu Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization that uses terror, violence and murder to advance its racist agenda.
The three-hour silent film has two acts - much like a theatre production with an intermission - the first of which begins by introducing main characters and setting the stage for the War from the social and political perspective of the Confederate South. However, from almost the first frame the wheels of propaganda begin to turn. Immediately following the introductory titles, words on the screen claim that Africans brought "disunion" upon the country, incredulously blaming the victims for their own enslavement. Then, the audience is introduced to the blissful Cameron family, a brood of Southern planters living in the proverbial lap of luxury. Repeatedly, the audience is shown harmonious imagery, to suggest once-happy times and to foreshadow the figurative storm just over the horizon: Family members embracing and kissing each other repeatedly, a hinting at future romance in the cotton fields (as smiling slaves work dutifully in the background), even frolicking pets on the front porch.
Then begin the truly disturbing images. After a title screen that mentions a "two-hour interval" for dinner for the slaves - perhaps to suggest by some bizarre logic that they were somehow fortunate in their enslavement - we are shown a boisterous scene in which Africans have congregated outdoors en masse to dance and play uproariously, with exaggerated smiles and motions to possibly suggest an innate immaturity that requires paternalism on the part of the white South for their continued survival. The scene concludes with a gleeful handshake between a black and a white, as if sealing the unspoken agreement of race roles: master and servant, superior and inferior. The underlying message here is such: Once upon a time, We (the white South) were happy, the slaves were happy, a kind of "Don't fix it if it ain't broke" mentality.
But then, from the film's perspective, the North proceeds to break it. We see Abraham Lincoln bowing under the pressure to sign a law authorizing the federal government to intervene in the affairs of the states on the issue of abolitionism, with scores of politicians hovering over him like vultures as he readies his ink quill pen. Afterwards, as the men recede into the background, the President dabs his forehead and eyes with a handkerchief, to suggest his inner disapproval. Next, we are introduced to the "villain" in the story, a Thaddeus Stevens-look-alike who bumbles with his hairpiece and falls prey to the charms of a female mulatto housekeeper, a vindictive character thus proven by her spitting at the back of an unwavering male that spurns her advances. Her involvement as an influential "devil" on Stevens' shoulder is cemented later on, in the second act of the film.
At the prospect of future conflict with the Northern aggressors, the South romanticizes war by staging bonfires and hosting extravagant ballroom affairs on the eve of battle, to again suggest the pageantry and purity of the Southern way of life. The following morning, the Confederate troops depart amongst cheering and waving onlookers (even their slaves cheer in approval) with bugles blaring. Accompanied by a triumphant musical score playing in the background, an affectionate father points out a patriotic banner to his adoring child over a threshold, which reads: "Our cause is just."
Two years later, the war is going badly for the Confederates. The Southern town of Piedmont is raided by black troops (who appear childish and poorly-trained) led by a white "scalawag" sergeant, the Cameron home is invaded and trashed, and the family females hide in a storage room in the cellar, fearful for their safety. As expected, the Confederates honorably come to the rescue, storm the house and restore order to the town, symbolically saving the sexual purity of Southern women, a theme that is heavily relied upon in Act Two.
The film then transports us to the warfront, which titles promote as "the breeder of hate" and "useless," where the "Little Colonel" - one of the three Cameron sons fighting on behalf of the South - shows such heroism and bravery on the battlefield that even the Unionists applaud his efforts, an opposing officer sparing his life out of sheer doting admiration. Obviously, the point of all this is simple: To clearly define the "good" and "bad" sides, to suggest that men as honorable and self-sacrificing as the Little Colonel - which implies the Confederates and their cause - could not possibly be on the wrong side of history, conveniently ignoring the immorality of slavery itself. The film goes as far as to bring the divine into the fray, as just prior to the Colonel charging off into certain death at the hands of the Union forces, the camera cuts to the Cameron patriarch praying on a Bible, suggesting that it was "God's Will" that the Confederates prevail in this battle, or perhaps worse: That God had a grander purpose in sparing the life of the Cameron son, so that he would one day form the Klan.
In Act Two, the racist stereotypes and innuendos increase tenfold. The opening title of the second act begins with a quote from President Woodrow Wilson, praising the KKK. President Lincoln, oddly portrayed as the "Best Friend of the South" (considering the earlier scene in which he approved the legislation that started the war) and the final buffer shielding them from Northern Radicals like Stevens, has already been assassinated. As a result, Stevens - or Stoneman, as he is called in the film - becomes a "king" and bane of the South, promoting the mulatto housekeeper to a higher position of trusted confidant, perhaps lover. In his chambers with his loyal Northern minions, Stoneman proclaims a male mulatto named Lynch (coincidence?), "the equal of any white man" and summarily dispatches him to Piedmont to tell the Freedmen to stop working, show disrespect to the white man, call for black suffrage and advocate interracial marriage, which reflects a deep-seeded racist fear of black sexuality that is a repeated theme in the second half of the film, and will be addressed again later.
The pace increases, and so do the stereotypes and historical inaccuracies. Freedmen get the vote, and black troops are shown forcefully discriminating against whites at the voting booth to put blacks in office. These newly-elected Freedmen representatives are shown sleeping in their seats irresponsibly, drinking alcohol and cheering uproariously at the passage of a bill that would allow intermarriage, again aiming for that age-old racist nerve. Then, in an unrelated scene, a black magistrate appeals to an all-black jury in a court of law over the fate of a black suspect, who they let free, making two libelous insinuations simultaneously: One, that Freedmen would allow criminals to roam the streets unchecked to commit future crimes on the basis of race, and two, that Blacks are simply not suited to serve as either judge or jury, the exclusive territory of the white man. Speaking of territory, Lynch shows a libidinous interest in a white woman - who also happens to be the love interest of Colonel Cameron, which establishes a love triangle to further justify white reaction in response - but this is minor compared to the introduction of the character of Gus, the black sexual predator.
Unintentionally, the film serves to expose the true character of white racism, in that it depicts the ultimate motivating fear behind the hatred, at its core: The threat of sexual relations between black men and white women. This is never clearer than when Nation reveals Gus, a white actor in blackface, stalking the Colonel's younger sister. Emboldened by Lynch and the new law allowing intermarriage, Gus lurks in the shadows seedily, waiting for the prefect opportunity to pounce. Eventually, a chase scene on foot ensues to the edge of a cliff, from which the sister would prefer to jump to her death than submit to Gus' advances, an "honorable" choice. As a result of this and all the aforementioned "injustices" perpetuated against the white race, the honorable Colonel forms the Klu Klux Klan to restore the honor of the South and that of white womanhood, and the film effectively makes heroes out of villains.
In conclusion, a technical masterpiece ... but a historical travesty.
The American "Triumph of Will".......2007-06-14
Viewing this movie is kind of like what it would be to see a sculpture by Michelangelo glorifying rape or verse by Shakespeare aggrandizing murder...
To say today that we cannot recognize the wrongs of the past or their depiction in art or literature is not an elevation of free speech but rather a limitation on our free speech.
We not only have the right but the duty to recognize what was wrong in the past and call it for what it was.
In this film D.W. Griffiths attempted to dramatically portray the justifiable rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Its release and presentation resulted in a sort of segregationist passion play that both spiked Klan membership (which peeked at over a million in the mid 1920s) and reinvigorated violence against African Americans (including a sharp rise in lynchings in the American south).
The film premiered during the administration of Woodrow Wilson who resegregated the American military (which had originally been desegregated under Abraham Lincoln and would not again be desegreated until the administration of Harry S Truman). It accompanied a phenonomenal rolling back of the clock for American egalitarianism and helped set the stage for what would become another fifty years of injustice for African Americans.
To be sure, watch the movie and witness its technical accomplishments. But beware of the evil that occurs when genius is placed in service of madness.
Learn from history to better avoid its errors.
For study, not entertainment........2007-04-19
It is true that this film was a great leap foward in the technical development of motion pictures. However, D. W. Griffith was too smart a man to NOT know what the story was about (based on "The Clansman", hello). Critics who like the film either already decided that it was a cinema classic before they saw it or are in some way racist themselves. The film is not subtle in how it poorly portrays blacks, and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan is not an unfortunate footnote to the story, it's the Finale! It can't even be said to be a reflection of the time in which it was made because it met with protests when it was released (this at a time when blacks were still second class citizens!). Griffith was a wizard with a camera and the film may be looked at for that, but only that.
Flawed by weird outlook of Director / Producer, but more timely than 'political-stupidity' of today!.......2007-03-30
The Director / Producer does a good job of this
up-to-the-minute cinematically modern (for it's
day) film, that takes a simpathetic look at the
Southern States. However, his mildly racist and
Pro Masonic proclivities come through as well.
A Pity. The Abe Lincoln in here unfortunatety
look like an 19th century pawn broker, with his
overdone makeup! The KKK part (a racist organi-
zation started by the masonic lodge) is stupid!
They never 'saved' anybody, and the Masonic Lodge
itself (which the KKKluxos Adolphus covered for)
has damned many mens (women's and even Children's
souls - the DeMolays)actually to hell! Still, for
it's time, until the KKKlan KKKlowns come riding
into the pic, is worth the watch. D.W. Griffith
could never get it released today! So get a cheap
VHS copy of it, erase the KKK part from then on
on the film and you have as close to a silent 4
star movie as you ever will. Just git your teeth
on the stereotypical parts of 'buck' dancing
negroes!
Average customer rating:
|
Hollywood Classics 15 Dvd MegaPak!
ProductGroup: DVD
Binding: DVD
Genres
| DVD
| Video
| Action & Adventure
| African American Cinema
| Animation
| Anime & Manga
| Art House & International
| Classics
| Comedy
| Cult Movies
| Documentary
| Drama
| Educational
| Fitness & Yoga
| Gay & Lesbian
| Horror
| Kids & Family
| Military & War
| Music Video & Concerts
| Musicals & Performing Arts
| Mystery & Suspense
| Science Fiction & Fantasy
| Special Interests
| Sports
| Television
| Westerns
ASIN: B000S9SQWC |
Product Description
This set includes: 1) And Then Tehre Were None, 2) Road to Bali, 3) At War With the Army, 4) His Girl Friday, 5) Private Buckaroo, 6) The Front Page, 7) The Inspector General, 8) The Little Shop of Horrors, 9) The Man From Utah, 10) The Birth of a Nation, 11) The Outlaw, 12) Of Human Bondage, 13) A Star Is Born, 14) Indiscreet, and 15) The Fly Deuces! Bonus features: biographies, trivia Q&A, animated chapter serach and more!
DVD:
- The Dead Pool
- The General's Daughter
- The Interrogation of Michael Crowe (True Stories Collection TV Movie)
- The Machinist
- The Prince & Me/Save the Last Dance (Widescreen Editions)
- The Romantic Favorites Collection (Bridget Jones - The Edge of Reason / About a Boy / Love Actually / Notting Hill)
- The Seventh Seal - Criterion Collection
- The Wire - The Complete First Season
- They Made Me a Killer
- Underground P.D.
DVD
DVD